The ABC’s of the Lived Experience of a Public Healthcare Provider on Measles Vaccine Hesitancy in the Community: A Qualitative Study
AbstractBackground: In response to the outbreak, the DOH launched a “Ligtas-Tigdas” campaign wherein they promoted measles vaccine as free immunization for children with ages 6-59 months and they even pursued a door-to-door promotion of free induction (Philippine Information Agency, 2018). Purpose: This study aims to explore and understand the situation of healthcare providers in the community on vaccine hesitation among residents. Methods: This study adopted a qualitative phenomenological descriptive research method that aims at a specific phenomenon to analyze the internal and external components of the problem. It extracts the important elements, and discusses the relationship between each element and the surrounding situation. Result: The themes that corresponded to each other are (1) supporting the advocacy of the local health unit, (2) work field as a burden to a public health worker, (3) consistency to the works of a frontliner, and (4) awareness to one’s own function. Conclusions: Fear of future assault and posttraumatic stress disorder can have a longstanding impact on the healthcare providers who have sustained or witnessed a physical or verbal attack.Key words: Advocative, Burdened, Consistency, Cognizance of Function
Copyright (c) 2021 Jocelyn Baluyot-Hipona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.