Examining the Use of Address Terms among Postgraduate Students in an Online Speech Community and Their Implication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.8(4).2024.8Keywords:
address terms, ethnographic approach, online speech community, post graduate students, sociolinguisticsAbstract
This paper examined the terms of address as an important part of verbal behavior through which the behavior, norms and practices of a society can be identified. As a classic study in sociolinguistics, Brown and Gilman (1960) pronominal address system highlighted the semantic power and solidarity in relation to address terms. Since then, several studies have emerged on address terms in various social domains notably academia, religion, politics and many more. However, most of these studies did not give much consideration to online speech communities. This study therefore focuses on sociolinguistic analysis of address terms among postgraduate students in an online speech community using ethnographic approach. The study selected three (3) postgraduate online groups from the University of Cape Coast. One hundred and fifty chats (150) were collected from each group and studied to reveal the key address terms used by the students to address each and also the factors influencing the choice of the address terms. The study revealed that the key address terms used among postgraduate students are personal names, descriptive phrases and titles. Again, the study revealed the following as the factors influencing the choice of address terms: situational and socio-cultural factors, level of formality, innovativeness and playfulness, gender and age variations.
References
Afful, J. B. A. (2007a). Address forms and the construction of multiple identities among university students in Ghana. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(3), 461-481.
Afful, J. B. A. (2007b). Address terms among university students in Ghana: The case of descriptive phrases. Language, Society and Culture Journal, 20, 1-7.
Afful, J. B. A. (2007c). Address forms and variation among university students in Ghana. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 16(2), 179-196.
Afful, J.B.A. (2006). Address terms among university students in Ghana: A case study. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 76–91.
Afful, J. B. A. (2006a). Non-kinship address terms in Akan: A sociolinguistic study of language use in Ghana. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(4), 275-289.
Afful, J. B. A. (2006b). Address terms among university students in Ghana: A case study. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 76-90.
Afful. J.B.A. (2001). Ghanaian address terms and Ghanaian-English contact: A study in linguistic variation. In D.D. Kuupole (Ed.), New trends in language in contact in West Africa (pp. 95–105). Takoradi, Ghana: St Francis Press Ltd.
Afful. J.B.A. (1998). The relationship between language and culture in Ghana: A comparative study of address terms in three speech communities in Cape Coast. Unpublished MPhil dissertation, University of Cape Coast.
Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeoki (Ed.), Stylein language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gumperz, J. (1968). The speech community. International encyclopaedia of the social sciences (pp. 381-396). Macmillan.
Gumperz, J. (1971). Language in social groups. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kerswill, P. (1994). Dialects converging: Rural speech in urban Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (1999a). The distribution and function of vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates. Discourse Studies, 2(1), 35-53.
Leech, G. (1999b). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johanson (pp. 107-118). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Lyons, J. (Ed.). (1970). New directions in linguistics. London: Penguin.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Meiyun Y. (1999). Applied Linguistics. Nanjing Normal University Press.
Oyetade, S.O. (1995). A sociolinguistic analysis of address forms in Yoruba. Language in Society, 24, 515-535.
Paolillo, J. (1999). The virtual community social network and language variation on IRC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4).
Saville-Troike, M. (2008). The ethnography of community. USA: Blackwell Publishing. http://en.wikipedia.org, Mar, 2013.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, Y. & Leung, C. (2004). What’s in a name? A study of the adoption of foreign names among university students in Hong Kong. Sociolinguistic Symposium 15.
Zhan, C. (2013). The ethnography. Journal of Language study and research, 4(6).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 
