Sustainable Cost Management and Green Business: The Role of Managerial Accounting Innovations

Muhammed Zakir Hossain; Latul Hasan

doi:10.59573/emsj.8(4).2024.24

Authors

Muhammed Zakir Hossain Department of Business Studies, State University of Bangladesh
Latul Hasan School of Business, International American University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.8(4).2024.24

Keywords:

Sustainable Cost Management, Managerial Accounting Innovations, Green Business Practices, Big Data Analytics, Activity-Based Costing (ABC)

Abstract

This research explores the impact of innovations in managerial accounting on sustainable cost management, focusing on the integration of green business practices. The objectives are to analyze how technological, process, strategic, and organizational innovations contribute to cost savings and sustainability performance, and to provide recommendations for practitioners and policymakers. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing case studies from various industries. Data collection involved detailed analysis of company reports and sustainability metrics, while statistical techniques were used for data analysis.

Key findings reveal that big data analytics and real-time reporting significantly enhance energy efficiency and cost savings, aligning with existing literature on the benefits of data-driven decision-making. Activity-Based Costing (ABC) and Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) improve cost allocation accuracy and environmental cost tracking, resulting in substantial cost reductions. Strategic frameworks like the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Life-Cycle Costing (LCC) effectively integrate sustainability goals with business objectives, promoting long-term financial and environmental benefits. Organizational practices, including cross-functional teams and strong top management commitment, are crucial for successful sustainability initiatives.

The study concludes that these innovations in managerial accounting are vital for achieving sustainable cost management. Recommendations for practitioners include investing in advanced technologies, adopting strategic costing methodologies, and fostering a collaborative organizational culture. Policymakers are advised to create incentives and regulations that encourage sustainable practices. Future research should focus on the long-term impacts of these practices, industry-specific adaptations, and the socio-economic benefits of sustainable cost management. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on sustainable business practices and provides practical guidance for enhancing sustainability through managerial accounting innovations.

References

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of management journal, 43(4), 717-736.

Barbieri, R., & Santos, D. F. L. (2020). Sustainable business models and eco-innovation: A life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121954.

Brundtland, G. H., & Khalid, M. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, GB.

Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829-846.

Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Valuing stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. Corporate Reputation Review, 18, 210-222.

Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS quarterly, 1165-1188.

Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2013). Environmental management accounting: the significance of contingent variables for adoption. Journal of cleaner production, 41, 163-173.

Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1988). Measure costs right: make the right decisions. Harvard business review, 66(5), 96-103.

Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1999). The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text and Cases. Prentice Hall.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Davenport, T. (2014). Big data at work: dispelling the myths, uncovering the opportunities. Harvard Business Review Press.

Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial Intelligence for the Real World. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116.

DeCanio, S. J. (1998). The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy policy, 26(5), 441-454.

Decoene, V., & Bruggeman, W. (2006). Strategic alignment and middle‐level managers' motivation in a balanced scorecard setting. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(4), 429-448.

Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2011). US State Policies for Renewable Energy: Context and Effectiveness. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2273-2288.

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.

Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.

Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited.

Flanagan, R., & Jewell, C. (2008). Whole life appraisal for construction. John Wiley & Sons.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage learning. Hampshire, United Kingdom, 633.

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014.

Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating Sustainable Value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56-67.

Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British accounting review, 46(1), 33-59.

Hossain, M. Z., Hasan, L., & Hasan, M. H. (2024). Corporate Governance as a Global Phenomenon: Evolution, Theoretical Foundations, and Practical Implications. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 13(2), 342-375.

Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., & Rebitzer, G. (Eds.). (2008). Environmental Life Cycle Costing. CRC Press.

Jourdaine, M., Loubet, P., Sonnemann, G., & Trébucq, S. (2021). The ABC‐LCA method for the integration of activity‐based costing and life cycle assessment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1735-1750.

Kambanou, M. L., & Sakao, T. (2020). Using life cycle costing (LCC) to select circular measures: A discussion and practical approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104650.

Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2008). Time-driven activity-based costing. Børsen.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Language, 11(322p), 23cm.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.

King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management science, 48(2), 289-299.

Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management science, 42(8), 1199-1214.

Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International business review, 19(2), 119-125.

Korpi, E., & Ala-Risku, T. (2008). Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(3), 240-261.

McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E., Davenport, T. H., Patil, D. J., & Barton, D. (2012). Big data: the management revolution. Harvard business review, 90(10), 60-68.

Niven, P. R. (2005). Balanced Scorecard Diagnostics: Maintaining Maximum Performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Accounting, organizations and society, 5(4), 413-428.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62-77.

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (2002). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. International Business: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 4(4), 261.

Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf?. Business strategy and the environment, 19(5), 273-288.

Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., & Kamiński, B. (2024). True transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selective disclosure in sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102700.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2010). Sustainability Accounting for Companies: Catchphrase or Decision Support for Business Leaders? Journal of World Business, 45(4), 375-384.

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19.

Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., & Zvezdov, D. (2013). Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review. Meditari accountancy research, 21(1), 4-31.

Shank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1993). Strategic cost management: The new tool for competitive advantage. Simon and Schuster.

Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Woodward, D. G. (1997). Life cycle costing—theory, information acquisition and application. International Journal of Project Management, 15(6), 335-344.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.