Assessing Critical Thinking in a Professional Context: A Case Study of Healthcare Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.8(5).2024.15Keywords:
Key competencies, Critical thinking, Healthcare professionals, Cognitive Skills, AssessmentAbstract
Background: Critical thinking encompasses analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information objectively. It is a critical skill in decision-making and complex problem-solving and is essential for effectively navigating demanding healthcare environments. Objective: The main objective of this study is to analyze and describe the perception of healthcare professionals (technicians, nurses, administration workers…) at the IBN SINA University Hospital Center (CHU) regarding their critical thinking skills. Study design: A descriptive quantitative analysis. Method: The assessment instrument was developed following a literature review of “Critical Thinking Assessment Models”; it consists of 15 items divided into five dimensions via a questionnaire that was administered to university hospital healthcare staff (N=100). Results: As a result, the main dimensions of critical thinking competence identified, ranked in order of importance, are: "open-mindedness," "consideration of alternatives," "argumentation," "logical reasoning," and "analysis and evaluation of results." Conclusions: The results highlight that participants perceive themselves to be competent in relation to the specific aspects of critical thinking within their field of activity.
References
Brunt, B. (2005). Models, Measurement, and Strategies in Developing Critical-Thinking Skills. Journal of continuing education in nursing, 36, 255‑262. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-20051101-05
Ennis, R. (1991). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. University of Illinois. https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/ennisstreamlinedconception_002.pdf
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), 44-48.
Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (1996). Assessment Design Issues for Evaluating Critical Thinking in Nursing. Holistic Nursing Practice, 10(3), 41‑53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004650-199604000-00008
Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (2008). Critical thinking and clinical reasoning in the health sciences: An international multidisciplinary teaching anthology. California Academic Press.
Facione, P. (1989). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. American Philosophical Association,
Gedvilienė, G., & Bortkevičienė, V. (2013). The importance of key competences in the context of lifelong learning. ICERI2013 Conference, 8. https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/New_goals/90/9/WG3_2016_11_02_Competences_Gedviliene_648909.pdf
Lassoued, D. (2017). Du développement des compétences clés en milieu professionnel au concept de « “compétences d’employabilité durable” ». Normandie.
Lavertu, É., & Gagnon, M. M. (2013). Évaluer la pensée critique en contexte de stages en soins infirmiers : Proposition d’un outil d’évaluation. Université de Sherbrooke.
Lunney, M. (2009). Use of Critical Thinking to Achieve Positive Health Outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking-Concepts and Tools. The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Sharples, J. M., Oxman, A. D., Mahtani, K. R., Chalmers, I., Oliver, S., Collins, K., Austvoll-Dahlgren, A., & Hoffmann, T. (2017). Critical thinking in healthcare and education. BMJ, 357, j2234. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2234
Zayapragassarazan, Z., Menon, V., Kar, S., & Batmanabane, G. (2016). Understanding Critical Thinking to Create Better Doctors. Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Research, 1(3), 9-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 
