Coupling-Decoupling: Textual Analysis of a Tik Tok Video on an Unconventional Marriage Proposal of a White Adult Heterosexual Male in Search of a Husband
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.8(6).2024.9Keywords:
TikTok video, marriage of heterosexual males, textual analysis, literature review, ethicsAbstract
This paper aimed to understand the sociocultural and economic context of an unconventional TikTok marriage proposal video from 2022. By investigating the religious and ethical implications of the proposal, the study sought to expand the discourse of marriage in the age of social media, which amplifies unpopular and dissenting voices. The study analyzed one viral video of a white adult heterosexual male, using textual analysis and literature review. The video was transcribed via kome.ai and analyzed for key points made by the speaker. Findings were cross-referenced with literature on popular marriage arrangements (Judeo-Christian-Muslim and traditional arranged marriages) and less common ones (platonic marriage, civil marriage, and domestic partnership). The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice were examined to evaluate the ethical soundness of the proposal, also considering human dignity and self-determination. Results revealed that multiple commitments among mutually consenting adults challenge traditional norms but reflect diverse ways to seek fulfillment. The proposed marriage between two heterosexual males aligns with ethical principles but depends on mutual understanding. This new marriage proposal offers an unconventional approach to addressing intimacy and relationship gaps among males by emphasizing personal autonomy, freedom from traditional expectations of exclusivity, and focusing on practical benefits rather than emotional intimacy.
References
Corinthians 7:2-5 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Anapol, D. (2010). Polyamory in the 21st Century: Love and Intimacy with Multiple Partners. Rowman & Littlefield.
Anderson, E., & McCabe, S. (2013). The ethics of outing in global politics. International Theory, 5(1), 37-56.
Arnot, A. (2020). The New Platonic Marriage: Navigating Intimacy Without Romance. Modern Relationships Press.
Badgett, M. V. L. (2009). When gay people get married: What happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage. New York University Press.
Bantugan, B. (2024a). Phenomenology of Open Online Voluntary YouTube Confessionals: Exploring Data Mining for Understanding the Phenomenon of White Males without Friends in the Age of Social Media. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(9), 412-425. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.809036
Bantugan, B. (2024b). From Status to Identity: Unveiling the ‘Othered’ Adult White Male Involuntary Celibates (Incels) on YouTube. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 269-282. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100022
Bantugan, B. (2024b). Phenomenology of Perceived Resonant Lived Experiences of International Male Shut-Ins Featured in a YouTube Video Anthology on the Global Hikikomori. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(15), 410-421. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.11150031P
Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (Eds.). (2010). Understanding Non-Monogamies. Routledge.
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (2007). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. University of California Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Biale, R. (1997). Eros and the Jews: From Biblical Israel to Contemporary America. University of California Press.
Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2000). Changing rhythms of American family life. Russell Sage Foundation.
Broyde, M. J. (2005). Marriage, Sex, and Family in Judaism. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bumpass, L., & Choe, M. K. (2004). Attitudes relating to marriage and family life. In Tsuya, N. O., & Bumpass, L. L. (Eds.), Marriage, Work, and Family Life in Comparative Perspective: Japan, South Korea, and the United States (pp. 171-186). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today. Alfred A. Knopf.
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848-861.
Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2012). Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: Theories, methods, and new directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 527-536.
Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage. Penguin Books.
Cossman, B., & Burrell, K. (2014). After marriage equality: The future of LGBT rights. NYU Press.
Cott, N. F. (2000). Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation. Harvard University Press.
Croucher, G. (2017). Australia votes for same-sex marriage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 41(1), 3.
Defense of Marriage Act, Pub. L. No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419 (1996).
Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press.
Dorff, E. N. (2001). Matters of Life and Death: A Jewish Approach to Modern Medical Ethics. Jewish Publication Society.
Duggan, L. (2018). The twilight of equality?: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Beacon Press.
Düwell, M., Braarvig, J., Brownsword, R., & Mieth, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity. Cambridge University Press.
Ephesians 5:25-27 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Ephesians 5:31-32 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Esposito, J. L., & DeLong-Bas, N. J. (2001). Women in Muslim Family Law. Syracuse University Press.
Genesis 1:28 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Genesis 2:24 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Genesis 1:28 (Tanakh). Jewish Publication Society.
Genesis 2:24 (Tanakh). Jewish Publication Society.
Gerson, K. (2010). The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation is Reshaping Family, Work, and Gender in America. Oxford University Press.
Ghaziani, A. (2017). Sexual minorities and politics: An introduction. Routledge.
Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., & Yabiku, S. T. (2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 1181-1218.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2007). The legitimacy of civil unions and domestic partnerships as an alternative to same-sex marriage. Wm. & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 16(2), 429-468.
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003).
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2012). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work: A Practical Guide from the Country’s Foremost Relationship Expert. Harmony Books.
Greenberg, B. S. (1990). The Jewish Way in Love and Marriage. Jason Aronson.
Harvey, C. (2018). Platonic Partners: Redefining Relationships for Modern Times. Penguin Books.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
Hebrews 13:4 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Henaghan, M. (2013). The Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Act 2013: A critical analysis of the need for legislative change. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 25(3), 459-482.
Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. Penguin Books.
Human Rights Watch. (2020). World report 2020: Events of 2019. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020
Hunter, R. (1996). Indissoluble Marriage: A Comment on Property and the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). Australian Journal of Family Law, 10, 101-115.
Hussein, S. (2001). The Everything Understanding Islam Book: A Complete Guide to Muslim Beliefs, Practices, and Culture. Adams Media.
Kang, J. (2012). Beyond marriage: Recognizing and regulating relationships beyond marriage. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 35(2), 351-416.
Keller, T., & Keller, K. (2011). The meaning of marriage: Facing the complexities of commitment with the wisdom of God. Dutton.
Kennedy, E. (2019). The fight for rights: A history of activism in the United States. Beacon Press.
Kurtz, S. (2004). The future of marriage and "Domestic partnerships". First Things, 145, 16-22.
Lauer, R. H., & Lauer, J. C. (2009). Marriage and family: The quest for intimacy (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[Ldiamondj]. (2022, September 30). "Hear Me Out" Straight Man Comes Out In Search For Another Man To Be His Husband & This Is The Reason Why! [Video]. Tik Tok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ldiamondj/video/7148970843710803242?lang=en
Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families, 1999-2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 805-827. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00734.x
Mello, L. (2015). The worldwide struggle for LGBT rights. Springer.
Netting, N. S. (2010). Marital ideoscapes in 21st-century India: Creative combinations of love and responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 31(6), 707-726.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015). Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
Pettit, J. (2019). The European Court of Human Rights and the rights of lesbians and gay men: The struggle for a "little bit of respect". Manchester University Press.
Psalm 127:3-5 (NIV). The Holy Bible.
Qur'an. (2004). The Qur'an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published c. 610-632 CE)
Qur'an 2:187. (2004). The Qur'an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Qur'an 16:72. (2004). The Qur'an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Qur'an 17:32. (2004). The Qur'an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Qur'an 30:21. (2004). The Qur'an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Regnerus, M. (2017). Cheap Sex: The Transformation of Men, Marriage, and Monogamy. Oxford University Press.
Regnerus, M., & Uecker, J. E. (2011). Premarital sex in America: How young Americans meet, mate, and think about marrying. Oxford University Press.
Richards, S. B., & Emens, E. F. (2013). After marriage. Columbia Law Review, 113(7), 1687-1754.
Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Harvard University Press.
Rubin, E. R. (2009). Beyond gay marriage: An argument for the dissolution of marriage. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 16(2), 191-223.
Rubin, G. S. (2001). The Traffic in Women: Notes on the "Political Economy" of Sex. In Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader (pp. 33-65). Duke University Press.
Sacks, J. (2000). A Letter in the Scroll: Understanding Our Jewish Identity and Exploring the Legacy of the World's Oldest Religion. Free Press.
Same-Sex Marriage, State by State. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.pewforum.org/2015/06/26/same-sex-marriage-state-by-state/
Sheff, E. (2014). The Polyamorists Next Door: Inside Multiple-Partner Relationships and Families. Rowman & Littlefield.
Srinivasan, P., & Lee, G. R. (2004). The dowry system in Northern India: Women's attitudes and social change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1108-1117.
Stacey, J. (1996). In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age. Beacon Press.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27-52. doi:10.1257/jep.21.2.27
Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132-147.
Talmud Bavli (Babylonian Talmud).
United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013).
Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. Broadway Books.
Waldron, J. (2012). Dignity, Rank, and Rights. Oxford University Press.
Xu, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(3), 709-722.
Zeitzen, M. K. (2008). Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Berg. The Holy Bible, New International Version. (1978). Zondervan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 
