An Observational Study on Problem-Solving Strategies in Individuals with Down Syndrome
AbstractThis paper is focused on the analysis of problem-solving strategies in a small group of individuals with Down syndrome aged from 13 to 22 years using the observational method. Three tasks are used to investigate one of the main components of executive functions (e.g. strategies of problem-solving): the Tower of Hanoi (structured task), Tetris Game (semi-structured task), and a set of Building Blocks (unstructured task). Together with these tasks a check-list is applied to codify the video-taped behaviours connected to the solution strategies of the provided tasks. Two independent judges reached a substantial inter-observer agreement in the coding of behavioural patterns expressed by participants. Results display that individuals with Down syndrome have difficulties to adopt flexible strategies and to be autonomous in the execution of tasks. Future research could study in deep the educational implications in school-context by means of specific trainings about the overcoming of ideational rigidity in problem-solving, specifically in unstructured wide-ranging situations, and put emphasis on the early emergence of planning skills and problem-solving for developmental interventions.Keywords: observation, problem-solving, Down syndrome, Tower of Hanoi, Tetris
Copyright (c) 2020 Elisabetta Sagone, Maria Elvira De Caroli, Maria Luisa Indiana, Rossella Falanga, Erica Napoli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.