Measuring the Efficiency of COVID-19 Policies in the United Kingdom
Keywords:
COVID-19, COVID Polices, Stringency, Unemployment Rates, UK GovernmentAbstract
The UK government has promulgated pandemic response policies since the beginning of COVID in the United Kingdom amid exponentially rising cases. Thus, this research assessed the efficiency of the UK government’s pandemic response policies. This paper argues that the government’s policies have not been as efficient as they could have been as the policies caused unemployment rates in the UK to rise immensely. We compared the number of COVID cases and the unemployment rates in the UK to the COVID policies by creating three graphs. We then compared all the graphs, and observed a pattern within two of the graphs, showing that higher stringency policies were insignificant to decreasing instantaneously the number of COVID cases. Using two of our graphs, it is clear that the UK government’s dilatory promulgation of its pandemic response policies failed to address the rising number of COVID cases in the country. Additionally, major COVID policies such as the first lockdown caused a massive increment in the unemployment rates. We conclude that the COVID policies lacked the impact and efficiency they were supposed to due to the government’s inability to announce the policy earlier.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.