Teachers and Students Perceptions on the Inclusion of Scientific Practices in the Division-Initiated Science Learning Activity Sheets (LAS)
Abstract
This study determined the scientific practices in the division-initiated Science Learning Activity Sheets (LAS) as perceived by secondary Science teachers and their students in the Schools Division of Calbayog City, Philippines, school year 2021-2022. Descriptive-correlational research with a questionnaire distributed to the 56 secondary Science teachers and 367 students was employed. The questionnaire compared the perceptions of the two-groups of respondents on the inclusion of scientific practices in the division-initiated Science Learning Activity Sheets (LAS) in terms of (a) asking questions; (b) developing and using models; (c) planning and carrying out investigations; (d) analyzing and interpreting data; (e) using mathematics and computational thinking; (f) constructing explanations; (g) engaging in argument from evidence; and (h) obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. The finding of the study revealed that the teachers and students agreed that the division-initiated Science Learning Activity Sheets (LAS) employed the different scientific practices. Further, the study also revealed that there is no significant difference in the perceptions of the two-groups of respondents on scientific practices. Thus, improvement of scientific practices in the division-initiated Science LAS is decidedly recommended and conceived.Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.