Statistical Assessment of the Difference between the Height Differences Obtained by Spirit and Trigonometric Leveling Techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.7(2).2023.21Keywords:
spirit leveling, trigonometric leveling, height difference, t-values, hypothesis, degree of freedomAbstract
Due to the limitations associated with the use of trigonometric leveling, it seems that height differences obtained by methods of spirit and trigonometric leveling cannot be compared. Thus, it becomes necessary to identify the extent of the relationship between the height differences obtained by these two leveling techniques. Using statistical tests, it is possible to examine such a relationship. Hence, this paper aims to investigate this relationship by subjecting the difference in the height differences, to a statistical test of hypothesis, based on the field observed data in the study area located in Southeastern Nigeria. To achieve this aim, leveling was performed for each of the two methods, on two different leveling routes. Difference obtained from the height differences computed between consecutive test points for each of spirit and trigonometric leveling were further subjected to statistical tests. Under some statistical assumptions, the results obtained show that the calculated t-values; |t|, for the two separate leveling routes, are 0.003 and 0.001 for route-1 and route-2, respectively. Using the degree of freedom (df) as 78, and a 5% level of significance (alpha=0.05), in conjunction with t-value distribution table, gives a t-critical value (tcritical), of 1.994. Comparison of this value against the computed values of 0.003 and 0.001 indicates that the computed t-value is less than the table value, at a significance level of 5%, leading to the acceptance of the null hypothesis (H0), and rejection of the alternative hypothesis (Ha). The computed p-values, corresponding to the t-values, are 0.998 and 0.999, for routes 1 and 2 respectively. Therefore, since the P-value > 0.05 it is safe to accept the (H0); that there is no significant difference between the height differences obtained using spirit and trigonometric methods of leveling, provided strict leveling procedures are observed. This study will assist project managers and policy makers in deriving the data from finished level survey which is used to design roads, highways and airfields.
References
Anderson, J. (2019, April 18). Two-Peg Test: How to Determine the Accuracy of Your Leveling Instruments. Onsite Installer. https://www.onsiteinstaller.com/online_exclusives /2019/04/two-peg-test-how-to-determine-the-accuracy-of-your-leveling-instruments
Bannister, A., Raymond, S., & Baker, R. (1998). Surveying (7th ed.). Pearson Education limited, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, England.
Bevans, R. (2022, July 09). An Introduction to T-Tests | Definitions, Formula and Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved November 5, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/t-test/
Bevans, R. (2022, July 15). Test statistics/Definition, interpretation and Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved November 3, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/test-statistic/
Bhandari, P. (2022, May 22). What Is Variance? | Definition, Examples & Formulas. Scribbr. Retrieved November 18, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/variance/
Brinker, R. C. & Minnick, R. (1995). The Surveying Handbook (2nd ed.). Springer Science Business Media Dordrech. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm:978-1-4615-2067-2/1.pdf
Chen, J. (2022, September 05). Z-Test Definition: Its Uses in Statistics Simply Explained With Example. Investopedia. Retrieved November, 19, 2022, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/z/z-test.asp
Doma, M. I. & El Shoney, A. F. (2012). Arrangement of the redundant observations for establishment of a GPS network using "LP" method. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 59(4), 305-321.
Dream Civil (2020, August 19). Rise and Fall Method | Numericals of Rise and Fall Method. Retrieved from https://dreamcivil.com/rise-and-fall-method/
Elaksher, A., Ali, T., Kamtchang, F., Wegmann, C., & Guerrero, A. (2020). Performance analysis of multi-GNSS static and RTK techniques in estimating height differences. International Journal of Digital Earth, 13(5), 586-601. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2018.1550118
Ghilani, C. D. (2017). Adjustment Computations (6th ed.). Wiley publishers. Retrieved from https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/adjustment-computations-6th/9781119385981/c09.xhtml
Gumus, K., Selbesoglu, O. H., & Celi, C. T. (2016). Accuracy Investigation of Height Obtained from Classical and Network RTK with ANOVA Test. Measurement, 90. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.045
Idoko, A. I., Sam, A. A., & Eboigbe, A. M. (2020). Comparison of Orthometric Heights Obtained Using Total Station and Differential Global Positioning Systems (DGPS) With Precise Levels Instruments. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 11(9), 15-28. doi:10.9790/1813-0908011522
Iduma, R. E. O., Abam, T. K. S., & Uko, E. D. (2017). Geostatistical study of the spatial variability of groundwater parameters in Afikpo and Ohaozara, Southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 9(4), 72-85. DOI:10.5897/IJWREE2017.0710
Kemboi, K. E. & Odera, P. A. (2016). Estimation of orthometric height using EGM2008 and GPS over Nairobi County and its Environs. JAGS, 17(2), 118-131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312031900
Lindstrom, D. (2010). Schaum’s Easy Outline of Statistics (2nd ed., Schaum’s Easy Outline). McGraw-Hill Education.
Maembe, w. (2012). Potential application of Total Station Leveling as a Precise Geodetic Leveling. B.Sc. Thesis, Department of Geomatics Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mahbobi, M., & and Tiemann, K. T. (2015). Introductory Business Statistics with Interactive Spreadsheets (1st Canadian ed.). Retrieved November, 19, 2022, from https://opentextbc.ca/introductorybusinessstatistics/chapter/the-t-test-2/
Mahun, J. (2017, January 09). Chapter F. Trigonometric Leveling. Retrieved from https://www.jerrymahun.com/index.php/home/open-access/elevations/19-elevations-chap-f?showall=1
Minchin, M. (2003). Introduction to Surveying (2nd ed.). Department of Training and Workforce Development, Western Australia. www.vetinfonet.dtwd.wa.gov.au
Maverick, J.B. (2021, June 08). What Assumptions Are Made When Conducting a T-Test? Investopedia. Retrieved November 19, 2022, from https://www.investopedia.com/ask/ answers/073115/what-assumptions-are-made-when-conducting-ttest.asp
Nedians, S. (2018, December 14). Trigonometric Leveling. Wordpress. Retrieved from https://surveyingwithsamo.wordpress.com/2018/12/14/trigonometric-leveling/
Nestorovi?, Z., & Del?ev, S. (2015). Comparison of height differences obtained by trigonometric and spirit leveling method. Geonauka, 2(4), 30-37. Doi:10.14438/gn.2015.01
Noll, M. L., & Chu, A. (2017). Detecting temporal change in land-surface altitude using robotic land surveying techniques and geographic information system applications at an earthen dam site in Southern Westchester County, New York. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017-1028. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171028.
Noll, M. L., & Rydlund, H. P. (2020). Procedures and Best Practices for Trigonometric Leveling in the U.S. Geological Survey. USGS. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm11D3
Paar, R., Novakovic, G. & Kolovrat, D. (2014): Vertical Component Quality Comparison of GPS RTK Method in Combination with Laser System vs. Conventional Methods for Height Determination. INGEO 2014. 6th International Conference on Engineering Surveying Prague, Czech Republic, April 3-4, 2014. Pp. 59-66.
Peprah, M. S., & Kumi, S. A. (2017). Appraisal of methods for estimating orthometric heights-A case study in a Mine. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 5(3), 96-108. Doi: 10.12691/jgg-5-3-1
P?rt?, A., & Hosbas, R. G. (2019). Evaluation of some leveling techniques in surveying application. Geodesy and Cartography, 68(2), 361–373. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24425/
gac.2019.128463
Reyes, C. D. (2021 October, 27). CEP233 - M8 - Leveling Methods. Scribd. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/535406435/CEP233-M8-Leveling-Methods
Schofield, W. (2001). Engineering Surveying Theory and examination problems for students (5th ed.). Butterworth–Heinemann, Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford, 521 pp.
Shreffler, J. & Huecker, R. M. (2023, March 13). Hypothesis Testing, P Values, Confidence Intervals, and Significance. National Library of Medcine (NIH). Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557421/#article-95301.r6
Tata, H., & Olatunji, R. I. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Change between Ellipsoidal Height Differences and Equivalent Orthometric Height Difference. Ghana Journal of Geography, 12(1), 132-144. DOI: 10.4314/gjg.v12i1.7
Turney, S. (2022, October 17). Student's t Table (Free Download) | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/students-t-table/
Vin Civilworld. (2021 November, 15). Types of Leveling – Uses and advantages. Retrieved from https://vincivilworld.com/2021/11/15/types-of-levelling-uses-advantages/
Wang, G. & Soler, T. (2015). Measuring Land Subsidence using GPS: Ellipsoid Height Versus Orthometric Height. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 141(2), 1-12. Retrieved from https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%29SU.1943-5428.0000137
Wolf, P.R. and Ghilani, C.D. (2002). Elementary Surveying, an Introduction to Geomatics (10th ed.). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 887 pp.
Zach, B. (2018, September 10). T Score to P Value Calculator. Statology. Retrieved from https://www.statology.org/t-score-p-value-calculator/
Zarko, N., Sinisa, D., Hidroelektrane, D., & Serbia, K. (2014). Comparison of Height differences obtained by trigonometric and spirit leveling methods. Geonauka, 2(1), 30-37. DOI: 10.14438/gn.2015.01
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 
