Engaging Young Minds: A Novel Approach to E-Learning in STEM Subjects

Azunka Ukala; Chinyere C Ukala; Martin Thomas; Eugene Ogbodo

doi:10.59573/emsj.7(4).2023.19

Authors

Azunka Ukala
Chinyere C Ukala
Martin Thomas
Eugene Ogbodo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.7(4).2023.19

Keywords:

e-learning, STEM, engagement, haptic feedback, edutainment

Abstract

E-learning in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) disciplines presents unique challenges in fostering engagement and comprehension, particularly among younger learners (11 years and above). Traditional e-learning approaches that foreground theoretical understanding prior to practical application often result in reduced learner engagement due to high abstraction levels (Clark & Mayer, 2016). This paper proposes an innovative pedagogical approach: begin with simple, hands-on tasks to pique interest and foster engagement, gradually integrating complex theoretical concepts (Papert, 1980). It explores how interactive technology, when designed for understanding rather than aesthetics, aids in visualising and manipulating STEM concepts. However, the paper acknowledges the limitations of current technology in replicating tactile real-life experiences (Shaer & Hornecker, 2010). It argues for the development of immersive e-learning models combining practical learning and interactive technology, to inspire young learners towards further STEM education. The paper invites collaborations to explore these proposed strategies and transform STEM e-learning.

References

Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 2(1), 15-44.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Open University Press.

Bonwell, C.C. & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.

Clark, R.C., & Mayer, R.E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Dweck, C.S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Digital, Inc.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J.M., Golinkoff, R.M., Gray, J.H., Robb, M.B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting Education in "Educational" Apps: Lessons From the Science of Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26-35.

Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.

Kolb, A. Y. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

LaForce, M., Noble, E., King, H., Holt, S., & Century, J. (2017). The 8 elements of inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-11.

Mayer, R.E. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40.

Norman, D.A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (Revised and Expanded Edition). Basic Books.

Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., & Cohen, J. (2006). Quiet Interfaces That Help Students Think. Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '06.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.

Pedaste, M., M?eots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.

Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. Paragon House.

Shaer, O., & Hornecker, E. (2010). Tangible User Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 3(1–2), 1-137.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of learning and motivation, 55, 37-76.

Ukala, C.C. (2018). Gamifying the classroom with mobile devices to enhance students’ of public junior secondary school academic participation in rivers state. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 6(3).