Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection with Rubus multibreatus Le’Vl Leaf Extract
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.7(4).2023.27Ключові слова:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Rubus multibreatus Le’vl, Inflammatory cytokines, Histopathological changes, Active Phyto-compoundsАнотація
Background: Rubus multibreatus Le’vl is a wild-type shrub of the Rosacea family, commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine. It is claimed to invigorate the kidney and liver and reduce inflammation. From other literature, the Rubus genus has been defined by the presence of diterpene glycosides, with or without the presence of triterpene glycosides, and classifying its phyto-chemical activity owing to a number of oleanane ursane glucosides.
Research objectives: To determine whether or not the plant had medicinal properties; To determine the structure of the metabolite(s) responsible for its medicinal properties; To determine the in-vivo activity of the active plant extract and medicinal significance.
Study design: Solvent extraction using different solvents with different polarities was used to test for antibacterial activity. The choice solvent extract was tested for metabolites via chemical tests and HPLC. The pure compound(s) identified from HPLC results were tested for antibacterial activity to determine the compound(s) responsible for antibacterial activity. The extent of bacterial inhibition was determined by MBC (minimum bacterial concentration), bacterial growth curve, SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis), and qPCR (quantitative polymer chain reaction) amplification of viral RNA. The histopathological changes of the liver and kidney, inflammatory cytokines, and IgG were used to explain relief from, or lack thereof, upon treatment with choice plant extract(s).
Methodology: Antibacterial activity was determined using both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria; MSSA S. aureus ATCC25923, E. coli serotype 078, and S. typhi ATCC14028. Different solvent extracts were used to test for its antibacterial activity in vitro. The powdered leaf sample was first macerated in ethanol (90%) and concentrated using different organic solvents with different polarities; ethyl acetate, dichloromethane, and n-butanol. The ethyl acetate leaf extract of the plant, which was rich in flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, resins, and saponins, was preferred as the crude extraction method, to the other organic solvents; dichloromethane and n-butanol, whose extracts showed no antibacterial activity towards the gram-positive MSSA S. aureus ATCC25923, E. coli serotype 078 and S. typhi ATCC14028. Only the ethyl acetate extract showed antibacterial activity towards methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Further experiments were done using the methicillin-resistant S. aureus TCH1516 (ATCCBAA-1717) (USA300), which poses a greater threat to the modern-day treatment of bacterial infections. A murine model approach using specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice was used to investigate whether the extract could inhibit S. aureus in-vivo, as it did in-vitro, to determine the bacterial concentration that could cause infection and mortality, and the significance of the plant extract as treatment, during the infection period, both at the beginning of infection and post-infection.
Results: The histopathological analyses of the liver and kidney, expression of inflammatory cytokines; IFN-?, TNF-R1, IL-1?, 1L 6, and IgG, showed the significance of the leaf extract in the treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection. HPLC analyses of the ethyl acetate extract confirmed the presence of 6 compounds; kaempferol, quercetin, gallic acid, ellagic acid, caffeic acid, and ferulic acid, and the absence of rutin. The most active compound of the 6, against S. aureus, was identified to be gallic acid, at a minimum bacterial concentration value (MBC) of 0.1111µg/µL while ellagic acid and ferulic acid followed next at 0.6666µg/µL and 1.7776µg/µL respectively. This, however, is not to say that another compound was not present, that could have inhibited the bacteria. Mass spectroscopic analysis may identify other unknown compounds that could significantly have useful medicinal properties.
Conclusion: Rubus multibreatus Le’vl certainly has antibiotic properties against Staphylococcus aureus and gallic, ellagic, and ferulic acids can be attributed to the anti-staphylococcal activity, however, only three bacterial species were used; S. aureus, E. coli and S. typhi, and it was not determined whether the plant or the pure compound metabolites; kaempferol, quercetin, gallic acid, ellagic acid, caffeic acid, and ferulic acid, had other antimicrobial activities; anti-anthelmintic, anti-fungal or anti-viral properties. The histopathological analyses of the liver and kidney, expression of inflammatory cytokines; IFN-?, TNF-R1, IL-1?, 1L 6, and IgG, showed the significance of the leaf extract in the treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection. Rubus multibreatus Le’vl plant extract improved survival, reduced inflammation in the anal glands, and cleared kidney abscesses. Both IL-6 and IFN-? expression was reduced upon administration of the plant extract, however, IL-6 expression was not reduced when treatment was administered post-infection. IFN-? was significantly reduced in the post-infection group, compared to the positive control group, which expressed 3-4 times as much. R. multibreatus Le’vl was also effective in reducing neutrophilia and necrosis, and overall preventing the formation of bacterial-like cells as seen in the liver of the positive control group.
Посилання
Akiyama, H., Fujii, K., Yamasaki, O., Oono, T., & Iwatsuki, K. (2001). Antibacterial action of several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother., 48(4), 487-491.
Andriana K., Kanellos, P., & Kalogeropoulos, N. (2013). Gallic acid bioavailability in humans. Handbook on Gallic Acid: Natural Occurrences, Antioxidant Properties and Health Implications. Nova Sci pub., (15), 301-312.
Arshad, N., Mehreen, A., Liaqat, I., Arshad, M., & Afrasiab, H. (2017). In vivo screening and evaluation of four herbs against MRSA infections. BMC Compliment Altern Med., 17(498), 1–7.
Assinger, A., Schrottmaier, W., Salzmann, M., & Rayes, J. (2019). Platelets in Sepsis: An Update on Experimental Models and Clinical Data. Front Immunol., 10, 1–19.
Bi, C., Dong, X., Zhong, X., Cai, H., Wang, D., & Wang, L. (2016). Acacetin Protects Mice from Staphylococcus aureus Sortase A. Molecules, 10(21), 1–11.
Borges, A., Ferreira, C., Saavedra, M. J., & Sim?es, M. (2013). Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microbial Drug Resistance, 19(4), 256-265.
Carestia, A., Davis, R., Grosjean, H., Lau, M., & Jenne, C. (2020). Acetylsalicylic acid inhibits intravascular coagulation during Staphylococcus aureus – induced sepsis in mice. Blood, 135(15), 1281–1286.
Carvalho, R., Carollo, C., Magalh?es, J., Palumbo, J., Boaretto, A., Nunes, I., Ferraz, A., Lima, W., Siqueira, J., & Ferreira, J. (2018). Antibacterial and antifungal activities of phenolic compound-enriched ethyl acetate fraction from Cochlospermum regium Pilger roots: Mechanisms of action and synergism with tannin and gallic acid. South African J Bot., 114, 181–187.
Cheung, G., Bae, J., & Otto, M. (2021). Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence, 12(1), 547–569.
Colak, M., Yapici, B., & Ali Y. (2010). Determination of antimicrobial activity of tannic acid in pickling process. Rom Biotechnol Lett., 3(15), 5325-5330.
Deng, J., Zhang, B., Chu, H., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Gong, H., Li, R., Yang, D., Li, C., Dou, Y., Gao, P., Cai, J., Jin, M., & Du, Q. (2021). Adenosine synthase A contributes to recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infection by dampening protective immunity. EBioMedicine., 70, 103505-103519.
Dennis, J., Eelco, F.J., Cedric, B., Shan, L., Ethel, R., Echoe, M., Keehoon, J., Shan, M., Peigen, H., Lance, L., Benjamin, J., Michael, O., & Timothy, P. (2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus causes sustained collecting lymphatic vessel dysfunction. Sci Transl Med., 10(424), 7964.
Dusane, D., May, C., & Tufenkji, N. (2015). Effect of tannic and gallic acids alone or in combination with carbenicillin or tetracycline on Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 growth, motility, and biofilm formation. Can J Microbiol., 61(7), 487- 494.
Feuerstein, R., Forde, A., Lohrmann, F., Kolter, J., Ramirez, N., Zimmermann, J., & Agu, M. (2020). Resident macrophages acquire innate immune memory in staphylococcal skin infection. eLife, 9, 1–21.
Gorrill, R. (1951). Experimental Staphylococcal Infections in Mice. Br J Exp Pathol., 1, 151–155.
Grabarek, E., Sekowski, S., Bitiucki, M., & Dobrzynska, I. (2020). Inhibition of interaction between Staphylococcus aureus ? hemolysin and erythrocytes membrane by hydrolysable tannins: structure related activity study. Sci Rep., 11168(10), 1–14.
Gudej, J., & Tomczyk, M. (2004). Determination of flavonoids, tannins and ellagic acid in leaves from Rubus L. species. Arch Pharm Res., 27(11), 1114-1119.
Hanses, F., Roux, C., Dunman, P., Salzberger, B., & Lee, J. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus gene expression in a rat model of infective endocarditis. Genome Med., 6(10), 93-109.
Hostettmann, K., & Marston, A. (1995). Appendix 1: Species of plants containing characterized triterpene saponins. Cambridge Online Books.
Jiang, X., Wang, Y., Qin, Y., He, W., Benlahrech, A., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Micheliolide provides protection of mice against Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA infection by down- regulating inflammatory response. Sci Rep., 6(7), 41964.
Jie, L., Du, L., He, Y., Yang, L., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Chai, X., Zhu, Y., & Gao, X. (2015). Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Plants from the Genus Rubus. Chem Biodivers., 12(12), 1809–1847.
Jin, Y., Yang, P., Wang, L., Gao, Z., Lv, J., Cui, Z., Wang, T., Wang, D., & Wang, L. (2021). Galangin as a direct inhibitor of vWbp protects mice from Staphylococcus aureus - ¬ induced pneumonia. J Cell Mol Med., 3(26), 828–839.
Kahkeshani, N., Farzaei, F., Fotouhi, M., Alavi, S., Bahramsoltani, R., Naseri, R., Momtaz, S., Abbasabadi, Z., Rahimi, R., Farzaei, M., & Bishayee, A. (2019). Pharmacological effects of gallic acid in health and diseases. Iran J Basic Med Sci., 3(22), 225-237.
Kim, H., Falugi, F., Thomer, L., & Missiakas, D. (2015). Protein A Suppresses Immune Responses during Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in Guinea Pigs. Microbiol., 6(1), 1–11.
Kim, H., Missiakas, D., & Schneewind, O. (2018). Mouse models for infectious diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol Methods., 1(10), 88–99.
Kim, T., Juan, S., Kim, M., & Jung, Y. (2010). Enhanced antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of tannic acid by thermal processing. Food Chem., 3(118), 740-746.
Knop, J., Hanses, F., Leist, T., Archin, N., Buchholz, S., Gl?sner, J., Gessner, A., & Wege, A. (2015). Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Humanized Mice: A New Model to Study Pathogenicity Associated with Human Immune Response. Infect. Dis., 212, 435–444.
Koichi, N., Katsuro, M., & Masaki, N. (1995). Carbohydrate-degradative/ digestive enzyme inhibitor and medicine and food/beverage formulated therewith. Google patents, 1, 1-68.
Korneev, K. (2019). Mouse Models of Sepsis and Septic Shock. Mol Biol., 53(5), 704–717.
Krishack, P., Sperling, A., Verhoef, P., Krishack, P., Louviere, T., Decker, T., Kuzel, T., Greenberg, J., Camacho, D., Hrusch, C., Sperling, A., & Verhoef, P. (2019). Protection against Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia – induced mortality depends on ILC2s and eosinophils Protection against Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia – induced mortality depends on ILC2s and eosinophils. JCI Insight, 4(6), 124168.
Kwiecinski, J., & Horswill, A. (2021). Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: pathogenesis and regulatory mechanisms. Curr Opin Microbiol., 53, 51–60.
Lacey, R.W., Alder, V.G., & Gillespie, W.A. (1970). The survival of Staphylococcus aureus on human skin. An investigation using mixed cultures. Br J Exp Pathol., 51(3), 305-13.
Ling, L., & Boufford, D. (2003). Rosaceae. Flora of China, 11(9), 195-285.
Lisowska, K., Lauterbach, R., & Mi?dzobrodzki, J. (2021). Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus Bloodstream Infections in Humans. Pol J Microbiol., 70(1), 13–23.
Miller, L., Fowler, V., Shukla, S., Rose, E., & Proctor, R. (2020). Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus invasive infections: Evidence based on human immunity, genetics and bacterial evasion mechanisms pathways implicated in protection evasion mechanisms. FEMS Microbiology, 1(44), 123-153.
Mrochen, D., Oliveira, L., Raafat, D., & Holtfreter, S. (2020). Staphylococcus aureus Host Tropism and Its Implications for Murine Infection Models. Int J Mol Sci., 21(19), 7061.
Murphy, A., Keeffe, K., Lalor, S., Maher, B., Mills, K., & Rachel, M. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus Infection of Mice Expands a Population of Memory ? ? T Cells That Are Protective against Subsequent Infection. J Immunol., 192(8), 3697-3708.
Nkonge, B., & He, C. (2022). Activity of Rubus multibreatus L e’ vl Plant Extracts Against Staphylococcus aureus. IJSBAR, 62(1), 107–126.
Nowicka, D., & Grywalska, E. (2019). Staphylococcus aureus and Host Immunity in Recurrent Furunculosis. Dermatology, 235, 295–305.
Olszewski, M., Falkowski, N., Surana, R., Sonstein, J., Hartman, A., Moore, B., Huffnagle, G., & Toews, G. (2007). Effect of Laparotomy on Clearance and Cytokine Induction in Staphylococcus aureus – infected Lungs Effect of Sterile LAP on Mouse Survival after. Am J Respir Crit Care Med., 9(176), 32.
Paik, W., Alonzo, F., & Knight, K.L. (2020). Suppression of Staphylococcus aureus Superantigen-Independent Interferon Gamma Response by a Probiotic Polysaccharide. Infect Immun., 88(4), 00661-19.
Palumbo, M., Carvalho, S., Ferreira, M., Siqueira, M., & Magalh?es, C. (2018). Analysis of the antibacterial activity of gallic acid and tannin extracted from cochlospermum regium against gram negative and gram-positive bacteria of medical importance. Sbmicrobiologia, 114, 181–7.
Pang, R., Zhou, H., Huang, Y., Su, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Inhibition of Host Arginase Activity Against Staphylococcal Bloodstream Infection by Different Metabolites. Front Immunol., 11, 1–11.
Pastrana, F., Neef, J., Koedijk, D., Graaf, D., Duipmans, J., Jonkman, M., Engelmann, S., & Dijl, J. (2018). Human antibody responses against Staphylococcus aureus proteins. Sci Rep., 8(3234), 1–11.
Phillipson J., Edwin, H., Pusztai, A., David, C., Ayres, & Loike, J. (2020). Saponins-Chemistry and Pharmacology of Natural Products. Cambridge Online books.
Pollitt, E., Szkuta, P., Burns, N., & Foster, S. (2018). Staphylococcus aureus infection dynamics. PLoS Pathol., 14(6), 1–27.
Samoilova, Z., Tyulenev, A., Muzyka, N., & Smirnova, G. (2019). Tannic and gallic acids alter redox-parameters of the medium and modulate biofilm formation. Microbiol., 5(4), 379–392.
Schindler, D., Gutierrez, M., Beineke, A., Rauter, Y., Rohde, M., Foster, S., Goldmann, O., & Medina, E. (2012). Dendritic Cells Are Central Coordinators of the Host Immune Response to Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection. Am J Pathol., 181(4), 1327–1337.
Schulz, D., Grumann, D., Tr?be, P., Pritchett, K., Johnson, S., Reppschl?ger, K., Gumz, J., Sundaramoorthy, N., Michalik, S., Berg, S., Brandt, J., Fister, R., & Holtfreter, S. (2017). Laboratory Mice Are Frequently Colonized with Staphylococcus aureus and Mount a Systemic Immune Response — Note of Caution for In vivo Infection Experiments. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 152(7), 1-16.
Selvaraj, S., & Paulista, U. (2021). Kinetics and antimicrobial activity of gallic acid by novel bacterial co-culture system using Taguchi’ s method and submerged fermentation. Arch Microbiol., 204(9), 584.
Shahrzad, S., & Bitsch, I. (1998). Determination of gallic acid and its metabolites in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr., 705(1), 87-95.
Silvana, S., Lenzi, A., Fernandes, S., Couto, D., Paes, E., & Aguiar A. (2016). Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Different Colonization Sites in Humans Resulting in Diffusion to Multiple Organs. Int J Clin Exp Pathol., 6(3), 1-28.
Surewaard, B., Deniset, J., Zemp, F., Amrein, M., Otto, M., Conly, J., Omri, A., Yates, R., & Kubes, P. (2016). Identification and treatment of the Staphylococcus aureus reservoir in vivo. J Exp Med., 213(7), 1141-1151.
Tatiya, N., & Chatuphonprasert, W. (2016). In vivo antibacterial activity of Garcinia mangostana pericarp extract against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse superficial skin infection model. Pharm Biol., 11(54), 2606-2615.
Thanabalasuriar, A., Zeng, Z., Stover, K., Sellman, B., Kubes, P., Surewaard, B., Thanabalasuriar, A., Zeng, Z., Tkaczyk, C., Cohen, T., Bardoel, B., Stover, K., Sellman, B., & Kubes, P. (2018). ? -Toxin Induces Platelet Aggregation and Liver Injury during Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis Article a -Toxin Induces Platelet Aggregation and Liver Injury during Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis. Cell Host and Microbe, 24(2), 271-284.
Tuffs, S., Goncheva, M., Xu, S., Craig, H., Kasper, J., Choi, J., Flannagan, R., Kerfoot, S., & David, E. (2021). Superantigens promote Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection by eliciting pathogenic interferon- gamma (IFN?) production that subverts macrophage function. Microbiol., 119(8), 519.
Tuffs, S.W., Haeryfar, S., & McCormick J. (2018). Manipulation of Innate and Adaptive Immunity by Staphylococcal Superantigens. Pathogens, 7(2), 53.
Wang, Y. (2011). Relationships among Rubus (Rosaceae) Species used in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Masters Theses Specialist Proj., 1073, 1-69.
Wang, Z., & Jin, Z. (2022). Expression and variation of serum cytokines in mouse model with different types of bacteremia. Food Sci. Technol., 2061, 1–5.
Welling, M., Korne, C., Spa, S., Willigen, D., Hensbergen, A., Bunschoten, A., Duszenko, N., Smits, W., Roestenberg, M., & Leeuwen, F. (2019). Multimodal Tracking of Controlled Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Mice. ACS Infect Dis., 5(7), 1160–1168.
Wu, D., Zhou, S., Hu, S., & Liu, B. (2017). Inflammatory responses and histopathological changes in a mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus -induced bloodstream infections. J Infect Dev Ctries., 11, 294-305.
Yang, K., Zhang, L., Liao, P., Xiao, Z., Zhang, F., Sindaye, D., & Wang, K. (2020). Impact of Gallic Acid on Gut Health: Focus on the Gut Microbiome, Immune Response, and Mechanisms of Action. Front Immunol., (11), 1–13.
Yung, S., Parenti, D., & Murphy, P. (2011). Host Chemokines Bind to Staphylococcus aureus and Stimulate Protein A Release. J Biol Chem., 286(7), 5069–5077.
Zaidi, T., Zaidi, T., Yoong, P., & Pier, G. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus Corneal Infections: Effect of the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) and Antibody to PVL on Virulence and Pathology. Investig. Ophthalmol., 7(54), 4430-4438.
Zhou, X., Ryoji, K., Kazuhiro, O., Osamu, T., Nie, R., Yang, C., Zhou, J., & Kazuo, Y. (1992). Oleanane and ursane glucosides from Rubus species. Phytochem lett., 10(31), 3642–3644.
Zhu, J., Ng J., & Filippich, L. (1992). Determination of tannic acid and its phenolic metabolites in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr., 577(1), 77–85.
Завантаження
Опубліковано
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 


