Analysis of Factors Affecting Deceptive Consumers of Counterfeited Cosmetics and Food Supplements Products in Lebanon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.8(3).2024.40Keywords:
Counterfeit products, Consumer behaviours, Deceptive consumers, Combat counterfeit productsAbstract
Most consumers in markets are subjected to any kind of cheating during their purchasing. The worst case of cheating consumers is selling them counterfeit products and deceive them that it’s a genuine one.
This study focuses primarily on combating counterfeited cosmetics and food supplement products through generating consumer awareness. To enhance consumer awareness by finding the factors that impact on them during their purchasing, and that make them be cheated in markets.
In regards to “deceptive consumers”, the researcher has delved deep into the factors which precipitated the consumers to be cheated on within the markets. What makes this study unique compared to previous studies was the sampling method which was utilized. Through the convenience sampling method, the researcher contacted the participants (the deceptive consumers) through their complaints which were submitted to the company based in the field of cosmetics and food supplements and its products have been subjected to counterfeiting.
The qualitative approach was utilized by following the phenomenological method and consisted of a focus group to have a deeper understanding of the factors behind deceptive consumers as well as their own personal experience.
Consequently, data were analysed using the content analysis method to cultivate the factors which affect the consumers and make them prone to counterfeited products. The factors include: lack of consumer awareness, market influence, word of mouth, materialism, and brand, and past purchase experience.
References
Al Atat, M. (2020). Review of Factors Affecting Non-Deceptive Consumers of Counterfeited Products in Different Regions across Sectors. Management Studies and Economic Systems, 5(3/4 Summer), 85-104.
Assocham (2014). Fake luxury market in India to double by 2015: Analysis. Retrieved from http://assocham.org/newsdetail.php?id=4342
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
Duggleby, W. (2005). What About Focus Group Interaction Data? Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 832–840. doi:10.1177/1049732304273916
Eisend, M. & Schuchert-Güler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12(6), 1-25.
Gentry, J. W., Putrevu, S., & Shultz, C. J. (2006). The effects of counterfeiting on consumer search. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(3), 245–256. doi:10.1002/cb.176
Kala, D., & Chaubey, D. (2017). Consumers' Attitude and Purchase Intention towards Counterfeit Products: Empirical Evidence from Uttarakhand State. Amity Business Review, 18, 80-91.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Peters, D. A. (1993). Improving quality requires consumer input. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 7(2), 34–41. doi:10.1097/00001786-199301000-00006
Pujara, T., & Chaurasia, S. (2012). Understanding the Drivers for Purchasing Non-Deceptive Pirated Products: An Indian Experience. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 11(4), 34–50.
Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009). The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review. European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 320–349. doi:10.1108/03090560910935451
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243641
WHO (2017). World Health Organization. 1 in 10 medical products in developing countries is substandard or falsified. http://www.who.int/news-room/detail/28-11-2017-1-in-10-medical-products-in-developing-countries-is-substandard-or-falsified
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 


