The Impact of the Development of the Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village Destination in Rembitan Village, Pujut District, Central Lombok Regency

Автор(и)

  • Muhamad Rendy Wiharno
  • I Ketut Antara
  • I Putu Sudana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.7(3).2023.4

Ключові слова:

Economic, Socio-Cultural and Environmental Impacts, Tourism Village Development, Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village

Анотація

The Sade Traditional Tourism Village is one of the mainstay tourist villages on Lombok Island, especially in the Central Lombok region. With local traditions, villages that are still natural and complete with traditional buildings, as well as ancestral heritage that continues to be maintained today, the privilege and added value of tourism for this village, are still being maintained. Tourism development in an area will have an impact on society, both positive and negative. This research was conducted in the Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village, in Rembitan Village, Pujut District, Central Lombok Regency. This study aims to determine the impact of tourism development on the economy, socio-culture and environment for the local community of the Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village, both positive and negative. This study uses qualitative data, with secondary and primary data sources, data collection through observation, documentation and in-depth interviews and literature studies. This study also used descriptive qualitative data analysis with the determination of informants carried out using a purposive sampling technique with key informants including: Head of Rembitan Village, Head of Management of Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village, Head of Local Guides, Traders, Hamlet Heads, Academics, and Communities involved in the development of the Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village. The results of processing data from 13 indicators, research results from the development of Sasak Sade Traditional Tourism Village tourism are considered to have a positive impact on economic, socio-cultural development and no negative impacts on the environment were found.

Посилання

Fandeli, C. & Mukhlison. (2000). Pengusahaan Ekowisata. UGM. Yogyakarta.

Febriana, Y. & Pangestuti, E. (2018). Analisis Dampak Pengembangan.

Kepariwisataan Dalam Menunjang Keberlanjutan Ekonomi dan Sosial Lokal Masyarakat desa Wisata Gubuklakah, Kabupaten Malang. Universitas Brawisaja.

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (1990). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.

Gayatri, Putu G. & Pitana, I Gede. (2005). Sosiologi Pariwisata. Andi Yogyakarta.

Junaidi. Ilham. (2016). Analisis Data Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pariwisata. Malhotra. 2009. Riset Pemasaran: Pendekatan Terapan. Jilid I edisi keempat. Indonesia: PT. Macanan Jaya Cemerlang.

Peraturan Menteri Pariwisata Republik Indonesia Nomer 10 tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Provinsi dan Kabupaten Kota.

Pitana, I Gde dan Diarta, I Ketut Surya. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Pitana, I. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata.Yogyakarta: Andi.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2001). Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sujarweni. V. Wiratna. (2014). Metodelogi Penelitian. LEngkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami. PB. Pustaka Baru Press.

Sugiyono. 2012. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: ALFABETA. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.

Spillane, J. (1987). Ekonomi Pariwisata, Sejarah dan Prospeknya. Yogyakarta: Kanisus.

Statistik Kepariwisataan Kabupaten Lombok Tengah (2017). Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Lombok Tengah Tahun 2018.

Yoeti, Oka A. (1997). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Pariwisata. Jakarta: PradnyaParamita.

Ulber Silalahi. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama. https://www.hestanto.web.id/definisi-pariwisata-indikatorperkembangan-objek-dan-daya- tarik/

Опубліковано

2023-07-17

Номер

Розділ

Статті